The Pope Francis Benedict and the Decision That Shook the World) [Pdf New] ´ Anthony McCarten

Interesting book highlighting the lifes Of The Two Popes Francis the two popes Francis Benedict where for the first time since 15th century there was 2 living popes Author Anthony McCarten is listed as a novelist and while this book looks like a historical account I have found a number of inconsistencies that make me affirm that it is in fact a historical novel albeit current history There are numerous footnotes which also give the appearance of being a critical narrative However many of McCarten s sources are encyclopedia entries or interviews in the popular press Many of these kinds of sources are actually deeply antagonistic to Bergoglio andor Ratzinger and there of sources are actually deeply antagonistic to Bergoglio andor Ratzinger and there little in the way of sources to counter that antagonism Having said this I recommend the "BOOK IT IS A GOOD NOVEL "It is a good novel written and understood as literature it raises many important and legitimate uestions that I as a member of the Church feel we need to continually ask ourselves Thanks Anthony McCarten Well done The Two Popes written by Anthony McCartenNine out of 10Pope Francis has just been in the news and not for some challenge to the conservative establishment and doctrine of one of the oldest institutions in the world representing a community which is larger than one billion although they talk in this very good movie about the loss of men and women who abandon the Catholic church in the Western world albeit seem to adhere in the emerging countries where they discuss about ways to adapt to difficult circumstances such as allowing priests to marry in remote parts of the A couple of days ago around New Year s Eve a woman had grabbed the pontiff and he was uite upset about it apparently slapping her hand twice only to apologize to her later in a public sermon showing again the indness gentle nature that we are used with and which is portrayed in this film nominated for four Golden Globes to be awarded in a matter of hoursabout twelve including for Best Motion Picture Drama Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role for Jonathan Pryce and Supporting Role for Anthony Hopkins Best Screenplay for Anthony McCarten and many other important awardsJonathan Pryce is memorable as Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio first and then Pope Francis in a complex role for if we had nown about the modest friendly side of the leader of than one billion faithful we have the chance in this feature to see him mournful thinking of a tragic past in his home country Argentina during which he had tried to balance a concern protective attitude towards his priests with the need to allow some Jesuits to continue their work for castaways which had been stigmatized by the military junta and in his painful actions the leader of the Jesuit community of the time seems to have helped although inadvertently the dictators in their mission of torturing those who oppose them including the priests that have been temporarily suspended by the younger BergoglioAnthony Hopkins is eually admirable in a character that appears less charming if at all than the South American clergy Cardinal Ratzinger who would become Pope Benedict a controversial figure insulted by many as a Nazi facing multiple challenges from his statement that appeared to incriminate Islam as a violent faith to the scandals plaguing the Vatican Bank pedophilia people in his entourage and his own tolerant approach to the crimes of priests who have been just moved from one parish to another after victims had accused them of sexual misconduct or worse rape abuse and so on with the view that it is better for tens or hundreds to suffer than for millions to lose their faith and ultimately their resurrection after deathIn fact in one of the many scenes they have together Benedict would confess to Bergoglio and vice versa with the former repentant of his role in the cover up of so many cases of sexual abuse though it is not clear if the cardinal Ratzinger just had some of the evidence on his desk and sinfully abhorrently From the Academy Award nominated screenwriter of The Theory of Everything and Darkest Hour comes the fascinating and revealing tale of an unprecedented transfer of power and of two very different men who both happen to live in the Vatican SOON TO BE A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE STARRING ANTHONY HOPKINS AND JONATHAN PRYCE In February 2013 the arch conservative Pope Benedict XVI made a startling announcement he would resign making him the first pope to willingly vacate his office in over 700 years Reeling from the news the College of Cardinals rushed to Rome to.

Anthony McCarten ê 7 Read

The Pope Francis Benedict and the Decision That Shook the WorldIs day It is fascinating that despite the gravity of Bergoglio s errors the reader still finds him sympathetic than Ratzinger We "Get The Feeling And Clearly "the feeling and clearly did McCarten that Bergoglio is aware of his sins and tries to atone for them Ratzinger sounds as if he believes himself sinless as if he lives on a plane of existence higher than the rest of humanity His blunders are owed not to the force of circumstances or difficult decisions They are of his making they are the product of his inability to lead to empathize with others and especially which is the most serious offense for a priest an utterly lack of self awareness and examination of the self The Ratzinger that emerges from McCarten s account is a disoriented old man who doesn t understand the world and what is worse doesn t understand himself To his credit McCarten does try to be impartial but his subjects don t really help We sympathize with Francis simply because Francis is much sympathetic My issue with the book is not the unbalance between the two personalities they are what they are The problem is that the structure of the book is very faulty and nonlinear He begins by
"telling us about "
us about then jumps to Ratzinger and then go backs to Bergoglio for no apparent reason Further it doesn t really tell us anything new It s not really a work of investigation but rather an account of information that can easily be found on the internet or in other books Overall a good introduction to the theme but by no means a comprehensive one I am looking forward for the Major motion picture they re making out of this though I am not Catholic but I was swept up in the story of these two popes McCarten does a wonderful job telling intermingling their histories as well as the history of the church He respectfully satisfies the curiosity one has for the secret Vatican traditions and then catapults the reader into the meat of this event what came before to cause it and the impact it has had and is still having on the world This is a story I honestly didn t think I cared about but has become one of my most moving reads of the year Excellent history on these two men Benedict and Francis The backgrounds of both of these men surprised me The author did an excellent job of comparing and contrasting them As well he explains some of the decisions made by both A clearly written history that leads us to where we are in the church today Glad I read this Anthony McCarten s play The Pope which is the basis for the film The Two Popes feels very much like a rough draft for his eventual screenplay While the film and McCarten s screenplay would ultimately make this story about Pope Benedict and Pope Francis it s strange to me how much McCarten s play introduces all sorts of superfluous characters most of whom are almost non existent in the original film I think after writing the play McCarten must ve realized that he could make this story simpler when it s almost entirely about those two popesI do admire the simplicity of this play though only two acts the latter of which focuses on just these two popes talking These moments between them are certainly the most interesting part of this story and I almost wish the entire play was just these two in conversation Also due to the limitations of the play format as opposed to film I like how much simpler this play is than the film The film goes into flashbacks that I only felt took me out of the film and muddled the basic idea too much But here all that flashback material is told through conversation and I find the story to be stronger because of itAgain it s hard to see this as anything than a rough draft for the film though I believe McCarten must have started the screenplay before this play even premiered and McCarten even wrote a supplemental book further explaining the history of these two popes The Pope ends up feeling like a solid idea that will be fleshed out in a stronger way through further iteration. Erything both be right Having immersed himself in these men's lives to write the screenplay for the upcoming motion picture The Pope Anthony McCarten masterfully weaves their stories into one gripping narrative From Benedict and Francis's formative experiences in war torn Germany and Argentina to the sexual abuse scandal that continues to rock the Church to its foundations to the intrigue and the occasional comedy of life in the Vatican The Pope glitters with the darker and the lighter details of one of the world's most opaue but significant institution. Gnored it or and to what extent he might have been actively engaged in saving the have been actively engaged in saving the while Bergoglio talks about what happened during the junta when he had tried and saved multitudes but he was still guilty of exposing a few in his efforts to work with the officers in trying to convince them to let us say execute fewer than they had intended people who opposed the regime would be summarily shot clergy included then they disappeared apparently thrown from military planes into the ocean never to be recoveredThe satisfaction of the viewer would be mostly intellectual although important doses of sentimentalism would be inserted in the plot of a narrative that has the two men confront each other for a good while only to become excellent friends after some debates initially they seem to stand for two opposite views of the future of the church with Benedict an arch conservative and the Argentinian cardinal an exponent of the progressive view which he has manifested recently when he showed understanding for homosexuals divorces and other categories making Benedict uite upset with the public statements of the South American who has an answer for everything when challenged on the issue of homosexuals the divorced Bergoglio retorts with uotes from the scriptures mentioning the need to help the ones who need it most the most sinful or words to that effectThe uestion that the public might ask would be how accurate this rendering of Not everyone s choice I feel but I had a personal interest and found it a worthwhile read I picked up this book because I saw the preview for the Netflix film and I wanted to get the story While the sections on the conclaves from 2005 and 2013 were good the rest of the book was meh and it didn t really provide anything new that wasn t already nown from articles documentaries etc To that extent it s not really meant to be a history like a review of all of the articles and documentaries produced to this moment But to be fair I also said the same about McCarten s book Darkest Hour 45Vatican in the news and me reading this book Such a cool coincidence Anthony McCarten rose to fame with this book Such a cool coincidence Anthony McCarten rose to fame with nonfiction book Darkest Hour which got Gary Oldman an Oscar after he transformed himself into a Victorian Englishman and with his screenplay The Theory of Everything which nearly offered the same accolade to Eddie Redmayne McCarten is clearly a The Monk as Man: The Unknown Life of Swami Vivekananda kingmaker and in this book The Pope Francis Benedict and the decision that shook the world he tackles one of the world s grandest institutions the Catholic Church At heart this book is a comparative study between the two Popes Francis and Benedict two very different men with somewhat similar backgrounds This background includes a close proximity with dictatorshipauthoritarian regimesfascism and violence For Joseph Ratzinger it meant a childhood and youth spent in Nazi Germany forceful enlisting in the Wehrmacht and in the Hitler Youth as well as a permanent fear of communism For Jorge Bergoglio it meant a whole life spent in a politically unstable country where the government changed at the whims of military juntas with the occasional human rights infringement to bootIt is undeniable that Ratzinger was much protected first by his parents and then by being lucky enough to live on the right side of the wall After the war ended he was offered the peace and freedom of West Germany which allowed him the luxury of complacency and a life spent in the proverbial Ivory Tower a place he should never have left Bergoglio s case is very different which is why his mistakes have much dire conseuences He spent his adulthood dealing directly with violence poverty and the disfranchising of the poor One of his closest friends was tortured andilled during the Argentinian Dirty War McCarten makes it clear that Bergoglio was partly to blame for the torture and imprisonment of two Jesuit priests a fact that he s tried to deny and actively conceal until th. Congregate "In The Sistine Chapel "the Sistine Chapel pick his successor Their unlikely choice Francis the first non European pope in 1200 years a one time tango club bouncer a passionate soccer fan a man with the common touchWhy did Benedict walk away at the height of power nowing his successor might be someone whose views might undo his legacy How did Francis who used to ride the bus to work back in his native Buenos Aires adjust to life as leader to a billion followers If as the Church teaches the pope is infallible how can two living popes who disagree on almost ev.
Basic TV Technology Hometown Proposal Oh Baby! Body/Politics: Women and the Discourses of Science Human Rights and Disability: Interdisciplinary Perspectives Rethinking Agency: Developmentalism, Gender and Rights